P0602 - Comparative Efficacy of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers, Proton Pump Inhibitors, and H2-Receptor Antagonists for Healing and Maintenance of Erosive Esophagitis: A Network Meta-Analysis of 164 Randomized Trials
Case Western Reserve University / MetroHealth Cleveland, OH
Daniel M. Simadibrata, MD1, Raul Jimenez, MD1, Thai Hau Koo, MD2, Ronnie Fass, MD, MACG3 1Case Western Reserve University / MetroHealth, Cleveland, OH; 2University of Sciences Malaysia Specialist Hospital, Kelantan, Kelantan, Malaysia; 3Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Metrohealth Medical Center, Orange, OH
Introduction: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) transformed erosive esophagitis (EE) management in the 1990s, largely replacing histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) as first-line therapy. Recently, potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs) emerged as a novel class of acid-suppression, offering more rapid and sustained acid inhibition, independent of food intake. Although few trials suggest superiority of vonoprazan, a PCAB, over standard-dose lansoprazole for EE healing, comparative data against high-dose or dual-delayed release PPI remain limited. This network meta-analysis aimed to rank the healing and maintenance of EE with acid suppressants including H2RA, PPI (standard, double, dual-delayed release doses), and PCAB.
Methods: Literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 2, 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included if they compared acid-suppressive agents (PCAB, PPI, H2RA) in adults with endoscopically confirmed EE or previously healed EE. Primary outcomes were cumulative healing rates of EE at week 8 and maintenance rates at 6 months. A frequentist network meta-analysis determined risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI), using omeprazole 20mg QD and placebo as reference for healing and maintenance outcomes, respectively. Treatments were ranked by P-scores. Sensitivity analyses used vonoprazan 20mg and 10mg QD as alternate references for healing and maintenance.
Results: Overall, 164 RCTs evaluated healing (n=117), maintenance (n=44), and both (n=3). For EE healing at week 8, zastaprazan 20mg QD (RR 1.17; 95%CI 1.09-1.26; P-score=0.95), dual-delayed release esomeprazole 40mg QD (RR 1.13; 95%CI 1.04-1.23; P-score=0.88), and dexlansoprazole 90mg QD (RR 1.10; 95%CI 1.06-1.15; P-score=0.84) were most efficacious. H2RAs consistently ranked lowest. Compared to vonoprazan 20mg QD, only zastaprazan 20mg QD had significantly better healing.
For maintenance at 6 months, omeprazole 20mg QID (RR 6.51; 95%CI 3.92-10.81; P-score=1.00), dexlansoprazole 60mg QD (RR 3.16; 95%CI 2.59-3.86; P-score=0.91), and esomeprazole 40mg QD (RR 2.87; 95%CI 2.54-3.25; P-score=0.85) were most effective. At 3 months, omeprazole 20mg QID, vonoprazan 20mg QD, and lansoprazole 30mg QD were top-performing regimens.
Discussion: Zastaprazan 20mg QD was most effective agent for EE healing, whereas omeprazole 20mg QID best prevents recurrence. Overall, PCABs like vonoprazan do not consistently outperform dual-delayed release or double-dose PPI.
Figure: Figure 1. Relative rankings of acid-suppressive agents for healing of erosive esophagitis at week 8, referenced to (A) omeprazole 20mg once daily and (B) vonoprazan 20mg once daily.
Figure: Figure 2. Relative rankings of acid-suppressive agents for recurrence prevention of erosive esophagitis at (A) 3 months and (B) 6 months.
Disclosures:
Daniel Simadibrata indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Raul Jimenez indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Thai Hau Koo indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Daniel M. Simadibrata, MD1, Raul Jimenez, MD1, Thai Hau Koo, MD2, Ronnie Fass, MD, MACG3. P0602 - Comparative Efficacy of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers, Proton Pump Inhibitors, and H2-Receptor Antagonists for Healing and Maintenance of Erosive Esophagitis: A Network Meta-Analysis of 164 Randomized Trials, ACG 2025 Annual Scientific Meeting Abstracts. Phoenix, AZ: American College of Gastroenterology.