Sonia Mehra, MD1, Lauren Alpert, MD2, Lina Jandorf, MA2, Marin Gonzalez, 2, Yuying Luo, MD1 1Mount Sinai West & Morningside, New York, NY; 2Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
Introduction: Patient preference towards the gender of their endoscopist may serve as a potential barrier for colorectal cancer screening adherence based on previous studies. The aim of this pilot study is to assess if honoring endoscopist gender preference impacts patient satisfaction outcomes.
Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study over a two-week period. Patients referred for direct access colonoscopy at a tertiary care center were asked about gender preferences prior to scheduling. A voluntary post-procedure patient survey was conducted to assess satisfaction with a 5-point Likert scale and qualitative questions. Demographic data were obtained via chart review. Qualitative and quantitative analysis was performed.
Results: Of the 49 patients asked about gender preferences (25 female, mean age 55.8 ± 11.1 years), 9 patients (18.4%) expressed a preference; all female and 50% of male patients preferred a female endoscopist. 16 patients (32.7%) were excluded as their procedures were scheduled beyond the study time frame (including 5 patients with gender preferences); the remaining 33 patients were contacted. Of this cohort, 22 patients (12 female, mean age 57.6 ± 10.2 years) completed the survey, with 10 patients (45.5%) undergoing their first colonoscopy (Table 1). Only 50% of patients recalled being asked about preference; there was no significant difference in satisfaction ratings between patients matched with their preference (4.72/5) compared to patients without preference (4.70/5). Qualitative patient responses are listed in Table 2. Patients who initially had a gender preference for their endoscopist were more likely to have a preference for future colonoscopies compared to those without an initial preference (75% vs. 22%, p < 0.05). Among those who had undergone a prior colonoscopy, including both patients with (n = 2) and without a gender preference (n = 8), 66.7% reported their current procedure to be more satisfying compared to previous.
Discussion: Fewer than 20% of patients expressed a gender preference for their endoscopist; however, amongst those matched with their preference, 75% expressed a gender preference for future colonoscopies and almost a quarter of patients without an initial gender preference expressed a preference for future procedures. Over two-thirds of patients who had a previous colonoscopy reported increased satisfaction. Inquiring about patients’ gender preferences for endoscopist may improve overall satisfaction, even if patients do not express a preference.
Figure: Table 1: Gender Preferences by demographic and variables of interest
Sonia Mehra indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Lauren Alpert indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Lina Jandorf indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Marin Gonzalez indicated no relevant financial relationships.
Yuying Luo: Ardelyx – Grant/Research Support.
Sonia Mehra, MD1, Lauren Alpert, MD2, Lina Jandorf, MA2, Marin Gonzalez, 2, Yuying Luo, MD1. P1919 - Mind the Gender Gap: A Pilot Initiative to Match Patient Preferences for Endoscopist Gender, ACG 2025 Annual Scientific Meeting Abstracts. Phoenix, AZ: American College of Gastroenterology.